The story so far: On November 10, the President for Microsoft’s Windows + Devices (W+D) business, Pavan Davuluri, spotlighted new AI features in Windows and invited users to a digital session as part of Microsoft’s Ignite event.
What should have been a fairly standard company update posted on the social media platform X instead received hundreds of comments, many of them negative, and over a million views before the comment section was locked down. These vehement reactions to the Microsoft executive’s announcement revealed a sharp split between the software giant’s AI roadmap and its customers’ demands.
As Microsoft introduced new AI features over the following days, the negative comments only grew.
What AI releases did Microsoft announce?
Along with a link to a company session about Windows, Microsoft 365 Copilot, secure AI, and agent productivity, Mr. Davuluri posted, “Windows is evolving into an agentic OS, connecting devices, cloud, and AI to unlock intelligent productivity and secure work anywhere. Join us at #MSIgnite to see how frontier firms are transforming with Windows and what’s next for the platform. We can’t wait to show you!”
What appeared to trigger many users online was the comment about Windows becoming an agentic operating system (OS), or an AI-powered system on a device capable of processing natural language commands and taking autonomous actions for its users.
Since 2023, Microsoft has invested heavily in Generative AI, first by financially backing ChatGPT-maker OpenAI before developing its own AI offerings as the distance between the two companies grew. Microsoft’s AI, or “chat-based generative AI interaction” that it calls Copilot, serves a variety of use cases, ranging from browsing online and maximising productivity to generating multimedia and summarising/correcting your content.
Whether a Microsoft customer is using Windows as their OS, Edge as their browser, Outlook for their mail needs, or a Surface PC for their tasks, Copilot is already present or easy to access. Meanwhile, the Microsoft 365 Copilot offering integrates AI with commonly used programmes such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Last month, Microsoft further shared that it was rolling out updates to make every Windows 11 PC an AI PC, powered by Copilot.
But when Microsoft posted, “We heard you wanted @Copilot Mode at work,” on X on November 19, the social media platform added a temporary context note that contradicted this, citing unhappy users’ responses.
Meanwhile, Dell COO Jeffrey Clarke noted during the November 25 earnings call that about 500 million devices capable of running Windows 11 haven’t been upgraded. On their side, multiple Windows 11 users have complained of glitches and delays.
Why is Microsoft facing backlash from users?
X users complained that requests for popular non-AI features had gone unheard by Microsoft and that existing issues with Windows were not being adequately resolved. Others raised concerns about potential bloatware in their Microsoft devices and platforms, as well as reduced data privacy, a drop in performance, increased security risks, and increased bugs and advertisements due to agentic AI rollouts.
Some users voiced their belief that Microsoft was focusing more on products aimed at businesses or enterprises collecting user data, rather than everyday users who wanted a cleaner, less complicated OS and device experience.
Complaints about Microsoft’s AI roadmap are not new. In fact, Microsoft in 2024 was hit with backlash from users over a tool called Recall for Copilot+ PCs, that would leverage AI to help users find content they had already seen. In order for this to happen, users had to opt in to saving snapshots, or screenshots, of their activity. Privacy experts criticised the Recall feature and highlighted severe security and privacy risks, while users also demanded ways to disable Recall.
In response, Microsoft delayed Recall and only shipped it in April this year. However, customer anger online over the company’s AI only mounted in the run-up to the Ignite event.
How has Microsoft responded to concerns?
Microsoft has continued to stress on the safety, privacy, and security of its AI-infused offerings, highlighting that they can be used for organisations, businesses, personal needs, industries, education, IT, and developer needs.
On November 15, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella shared a post on X where he hailed the company’s partnerships with other firms such as OpenAI and AMD. He also batted in favour of a more collaborative approach where the success of AI adoption could be gauged through societal change and positive breakthroughs rather than company valuations.
“Let us move beyond zero-sum thinking and the winner-take-all hype and focus instead on building broad capabilities that harness the power of this technology to achieve local success in each firm, which then leads to broad economic growth and societal benefits,” Mr. Nadella posted.
On November 19, Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman took to X to address users’ anger and criticism more directly, but pegged negative reactions to a lack of excitement surrounding the potential of AI.
“Jeez there so many cynics! It cracks me up when I hear people call AI underwhelming. I grew up playing Snake on a Nokia phone! The fact that people are unimpressed that we can have a fluent conversation with a super smart AI that can generate any image/video is mindblowing to me,” posted Mr. Suleyman.
In response, multiple users complained about AI hallucination, or the risk of their work being undermined by inaccurate information retrieved by AI from dubious or even unusable sources.
Furthermore, Mr. Nadella and Mr. Suleyman’s reactions were both branded as being out of touch with customer sentiments.
Are other firms facing similar complaints?
Yes and no. While multiple Big Tech giants are exploring agentic AI features and products, the reactions from customers have been drastically different.
For example, relatively new companies such as ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and Google/Amazon-backed Anthropic face far less criticism from users when they launch new Generative AI products or announce AI integrations. This is because they are fundamentally AI companies, so customer expectations align with the company’s area of exploration. When such companies do face criticism, user complaints are likely to focus on AI product quality, the legality of the AI training processes, cybersecurity risks, or the impact of their chatbots on people’s health and behaviour. The two companies also do not sell consumer-focused devices.
However, when legacy giants such as Microsoft or Google—known for their solid market presence and their consumer hardware offerings—rapidly hopped on the Generative AI bandwagon, many users felt as if the highly experimental technology was being forced into every part of their personal tech ecosystem, whether they wanted it there or not.
Google also fielded complaints surrounding its AI Overviews in Search, or AI-generated search summaries. Digital experts warned that revenue to media companies, smaller publishers, and Google’s own rivals could be impacted by the spike in AI-powered browsing, with accuracy taking a hit as well.
